[PREV - RADIO_CHANGE] [TOP]
COOL
McCluhan, in "Understanding
Media" provided a unique
definition for "Coolness"...
A cool media is personally engaging.
A hot media is one that encourages CLOUDY
passivity.
To my eye, he conflates two
different characteristics in
this one scale: "High Definition"
media is definitely "Hot",
but he also talks about what Virtual Reality:
we would call "interactivity" Hot or Cold?
at the same time.
He calls Radio a "Hot" medium
in comparision to the "Cool"
Telephone.
But if a cool media is one
that bombards you with a But obviously, "definition"
relatively small amount of (which we often call "bandwidth"
bits per second, then TV is these days) is a continuum, and
Hot. Radio is Cool. in comparision to TV, Radio is
at least cooler.
Cool people then, like radio
because it is a cool medium, And what if we compare
perhaps because it requires television to the even
(or at least allows) a greater higher definition
use of your imagination than movies-shown-in-theaters?
Hot media like TV, which just
hands everything to you and Arguably, the theater
requires only passive environment is more
reception of the information. engaging than television,
but for still a third
On the other hand, people sort of reason: the
driving cars like cool media, relative absence of
because the main part of their distraction and
attention is taken up by what interruption.
they're doing. They can't
afford the total engagement a And possibly...
"hot" media requires. because it's *less*
interactive? You
don't have the option
There's an older, almost of channel flipping,
forgotten definition of "cool", and so you don't go
as in "playing it cool", which without making a
means keeping a low profile so commitment to focus.
the authorities will leave you
alone. Painting your car in
psychedelic day-glo colors would
therefore not be "cool".
--------
[NEXT - CLOUDY]