[PREV - QUASICRYSTALS] [TOP]
CRYSTALLINE_DEFINITION
February 18, 2012
In the classic definition
of a crystal, they have
"translational symmetry":
you can pick out a small
basic sub-pattern (the
"unit cell") and generate Like using a stamp pad
the layout of the entire to make wrapping paper.
crystal by duplicating
that sub-pattern end-to-end
throughout the region.
But really crystals are phenomena. There are these
things we find in nature, that have a certain look
and shape to them (e.g. gemstones) and we've
classified them together as "crystals", then we
started looking at them more closely, thinking
about what underlying structure is implied by their
outward behavior, and using that we refined a
theory of what they are-- matter arranged in a
certain kind of regular way-- and then we started
using this knowledge to refine the category: things
that you might have once categorized as crystals
are now excluded (e.g. glass prisims), and things
that it wouldn't have occured to you to call
crystals now are included (e.g. opague things like
crystalline silicon or aluminum).
Our physical understanding of what crystals
are worked so well that we could get dogmatic
about it. Angles between faces, diffraction
patterns, diagrams of regular atomic lattices,
varying materials properties in different
directions... it all tied together so nicely
that we could imagine that we had our finger
on the nature of reality.
Yes, there are some odd
aspects of physics off
in the corners of Understanding and evidence
relativity or quantum were all in sync to the
mechanics, but not with point there was little
crystals. need to distinguish
But: using that nice, simple
geometric definition of
crystals, you can show that
five-fold symmetry doesn't
happen.
And yet: you can get
x-ray diffraction And rather than revise
patterns that show that the meaning of the word
it happens. The "crystal", we invented
phenomena diverged from a new category, something
our understanding... sort of like them
but not exactly.
QUASICRYSTALS
--------
[NEXT - DOGMA]