[PREV - TO_FIND_WHAT_WORKS_LOOK] [TOP]
CSG
April 08, 2006
I'm groping for a term
here, something like The CSG is mathematically
oriented, in the traditions
"computer science geeks". of the academic discipline
of "computer science".
("Computer Scientist"
isn't good enough: that Many programmers come
would imply someone with out of this discipline,
a PhD in the field.) but many others --
like myself -- don't.
The perl culture is
happy to take ideas THE_PERL_AFFAIR
from the "computer
science" culture when
they seem useful,
Larry Wall's but is not itself a
technical part of that culture.
background is
in unix systems There's no
programming, end of
and he often criticism of The computer science
cites the perl that geeks like to pretend
influence of arises out of that their objections to
linguistics the CSG perl are rooted in the
on his design culture hard-edged knowledge
of perl. that lies at the heart
of their discipline.
An artificial
language using My contention is that this
some concepts isn't so, and can't be so,
from natural and it's best to think of
languages. it as a cultural mismatch.
[ref]
COMPUTER_SCIENCE_PROOF
Steve Yegge dismisses
this as a "non-argument",
and reveals much about (01/2020)
his own biases in the
process. Maybe I was thinking of these
remarks:
He can't perceive it as
an argument, because "Larry uses 'just like English' as
it's an argument at a one of his typical silly appeals to
more fundamental level nonreason."
than he's used to: it
challenges things he [ref]
believes can't be
challenged, but isn't Actually, Larry doesn't say
really sure why. anything about perl being like
English, he talks about using
features from natural languages
in general.
--------
[NEXT - RELIGIOUS_ISSUES]