[PREV - UNDESERVED_TITLES] [TOP]
EDITED_REALITY
February 1, 2007
When I was a young and naive teenage
reader, I had an unconscious worship
of the writers that I liked:
I trusted them to play it
straight with me, to always
tell the truth to the best (And I was a
of their ability. Harlan Ellison
fan!)
It took some years to
understand it, but that
does not include telling
you the truth about
editors. It is not
possible for a commercial
author making a living on One of the early puzzles
the sufferance of editorial I had to solve: why
decisions to do more than was Anthony Boucher so
hint at their actual well respected by the
opinions of editors. writers I respected?
All of those glowing
remarks about the
fellow... yet "Rocket
to the Morgue" was an
One example: there are awfully thin piece of
tales about *some* editor fannish fiction, and
with a reputation for Boucher's other
screwing around with mystery novels aren't
wording for no apparent any better.
purpose. Some writers
went as far as to The answer is rather
experiment with planting simple, though: he
intentional errors in the was the editor of
manuscript so that the "Fantasy and Science
editor would feel like he Fiction" for many years.
had done some work and
perhaps leave the rest And a good
alone. editor, I
must say.
You were allowed
to hear this story...
but the editor's BLACK_MASKS
name would be My guess: Horace
discretely left out Gold... but if that's
of the tale. a wrong guess, it
illustrates why you HORACE_GOLD
should name names or
not speak.
And then there's the
case of Bruce Sterling, STERLING_DISTRACTED
who takes it to extremes:
Ellen Datlow, he informed
us in "Mirroshades" was "a
shades-packing sister in
the vanguard of the (She bought shorts
ideologically correct" for Omni at two
grand a pop.)
And in "Tommorrow
Now", he tells us
that Kevin Kelley is
"the Emerson of the CONTROL
Internet Era"
--------
[NEXT - BLACK_MASKS]