[PREV - MOVIES] [TOP]
HUGO_SKIMMER
September 12, 2015
From a comment
posted to usenet.
The question at hand is, are the Hugo Awards
a useful way of finding interesting books?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Award_for_Best_Novel
Despite the weird misstep with Clifton & Riley's "They'd Rather
Be Right" in the second year, the early history of the award
contains quie a few really good, and many at least interesting,
books:
Bester's "The Demolished Man"
Leiber's "The Big Time"
Blish's "A Case Of Conscience"
Heinlien's "Starship Troopers"
Walter M. Miller. Jr.'s "A Canticle for Leibowitz"
If you include the nominations, there's a lot of
favorite books of mine included there, which strike
me as being unjustly obscure, these days:
Budry's "Rogue Moon" AJAY
Heinlein's "Have Space Suit-- Will Travel" HEINLEIN
Simak's "Time is the Simplest Thing" (aka "The Fisherman") GOING_ALIEN
Samuel R. Delany's "Babel-17" BABEL-17
Someone on rec.arts.sf.lovers once made the
experiment of reading through the winnners
in sequence, and ended up complaining about
Leiber's "The Wanderer" quite a bit, but if
you ask me it's problems are fairly minor--
that's another really good book.
Looking through the recent history of the award
(I haven't been paying very much attention to of
late) there's still quite a lot of good stuff:
Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" (the 2010 winner)
Cixin Liu's "The Three-Body Problem" (the 2015 winner)
But with this book, I first heard about
it when I saw it on the bestsellers list
for Borderlands Books in SF...
And Charles Stross looks like he's
going for a record for most Seven nominations,
nominations without a win. from 2004 to 2014.
But then, I didn't *need* this
award to tell me I want to pay
attention to Charles Stross.
CHARLES_STROSS
MERCHANT_PRINCES
--------
[NEXT - FIFTY_IN_ONE]