[PREV - LEVI-STRAUSS_BARRACKS] [TOP]
MYTH_KEY
December 4, 2021
In George Elliot's "Middlemarch" (1871-2),
"The Key to All Myths" is a fictional
scholarly project An ambitious project by the
aging scholar Casaubon-- his life's work,
though doomed to be left uncompleted.
Casaubon was married to the young heroine of
"Middlemarch", and so he is inevitably
presumed to be at least loosely modeled on
Herbert Spencer, the older partner of the
young George Elliot.
Quoting June Scott Szirotny's piece from 2001,
"Edward Casaubon and Herbert Spencer": https://georgeeliotreview.org/items/show/546
"Casaubon, thinking, in his "Hey to all Mythologies",
to trace the origin of all myths to a single culture,
but not able to read the necessary German works,
produces only a theory that 'floated among flexible
conjectures no more solid than those etymologies which
seemed strong because of likeness in sound, until it
was shown that likeness in sound made them impossible'
(xlvii, 469-70)."
"Likewise, Spencer, who, as George Eliot recognized
was not a great reader (GEL, III:338), bases his
_Synthetic Philosophy_, another ambitious synthesis
of knowledge, largely on _a priori_ assumptions.
Huxley quipped, 'Spencer's idea of a tragedy is a
deduction killed by a fact'. [16] "
"With little tolerance for knowledge not rooted in
facts, George Eliot repeatedly complained of
Spencer's disposition to generalize without
sufficient regard for verifiable evidence. In 1852,
describing what she called 'a *proof*-hunting
expedition' on which she accompanied him, she wrote,
'Of course, if the flowers didn't correspond to the
theories, we said "*tant pis pour les fleurs"' (GEL,
II: 40). ... In 1877, she complained that 'his mind
both "spontanément and systématiquement" rejects
everything that cannot be wrought into the web of his
own production' (GEL, VI:426). "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Spencer
Wikipedia-- which on occasion does
better than the Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy-- on Herbert Spencer: The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy article seems a
"The basis for Spencer's appeal to self-conscious attempt at
many of his generation was that he rehabilitating Spencer,
appeared to offer a ready-made defending him from charges
system of belief which could of "social darwinism".
substitute for conventional
religious faith at a time when If you haven't heard those
orthodox creeds were crumbling charges yet, it has a "what
under the advances of modern are they going on about?"
science. Spencer's philosophical feel to it.
system seemed to demonstrate that
it was possible to believe in the
ultimate perfection of humanity on
the basis of advanced scientific
conceptions such as the first law
of thermodynamics and biological
evolution."
"In essence Spencer's philosophical
vision was formed by a combination
of deism and positivism."
AUGUSTE_COMTE
Continuing with Wikipedia:
"Spencer followed Comte in aiming for the
unification of scientific truth; it was in
this sense that his philosophy aimed to be
'synthetic.' Like Comte, he was committed to
the universality of natural law, the idea
that the laws of nature applied without
exception, to the organic realm as much as
to the inorganic, and to the human mind as
much as to the rest of creation."
"... Even in his writings on ethics, he
held that it was possible to discover
'laws' of morality that had the status of
laws of nature while still having
normative content, a conception which can
be traced to George Combe's Constitution
of Man. "
"... Spencer sought the unification of
scientific knowledge in the form of the
reduction of all natural laws to one
fundamental law, the law of evolution."
In the fifty years since Middlemarch, the intellectual
world had not progressed very much, hence the success of
Lévi-Strauss.
LEVI-STRAUSS
--------
[NEXT - POSSESSIVES]