[PREV - BEATNIK_59] [TOP]
GENERATING_BEAT
Early in 2003
Additions: June 01, 2006
Early in 2003,
I wrote this
for the
Calling this relatively small group wikipedia "Beat
of struggling writers, artists, Generation"
hustlers and drug addicts a page.
"generation" was to make the claim
that they were representative and
important -- the beginnings of a new
trend, analogous to the influential
Lost Generation. This is the kind of
bold move that could be seen as
delusions of grandeur, aggressive
salesmanship or perhaps a display of
perceptive insight. History shows it The form of this
was clearly not just a delusion, but statement is
possibly a real insight into some mutating around
real trends that became out in wikipedia
self-reinforcing: the label helped land, and perhaps
to create what it described. for some good
reasons, but
still I want it
preserved in some
form... so maybe
it belongs here.
GENESIS_OF_THE_CYBER-PUNKS
But one might wonder if
it is "neutral" to
The quaint Damon Runyan New repeat the press
York of boozey gamblers starts agentry of Kerouac
getting interested in some and Holmes uncritically.
heavier drugs (maybe an
interest in opiates is spread I'm afraid the
by wounded ex-GIs at the close wikipedia answer
of WWII: "Sister Morphine"); would have to be
"yes, it is",
What honor there is because everyone
among the thieves gets who studies the
increasingly strained; the subject buys
into that point
The Broadway scene starts to of view.
develop a nastier edge...
It's the consensus
Kerouac and Holmes pick up on opinion, therefore
an adjective from this that is what should
underground: "beat". be written about.
They put their It doesn't have
own spin on it. to be right.
(Though it
helps if
Maybe this is typical: it's difficult
to prove
The behavioral change wrong.)
happens first.
Someone notices, dimly, that
things are a little different,
and invents an adjective years
later.
Then the existence of the
new terminology changes
people's perception, and
creates further behavioral
changes.
That third phase can
be so striking that
it's now pretty common
for people to try to
manufacture a term,
to put over a new
scene change.
This rarely works,
if ever: the new
terminology has
such a reek of
inauthenticity
about it that
even if it does
catch on, the
usage seems very
half-hearted,
and it soon fades.
--------
[NEXT - PASSAGE]