[PREV - THE_BORG] [TOP]
THE_ROVERS
November 27, 2006
... and determination against
the rovers.
There's a new breed out
on the net now.
It's not just amateurs
and fanatics any more,
now we've got the
professionals.
The hired guns;
The astroturf brigade;
Jammers and provacateurs... PROVOCATEUR
This last election season,
I've started calling them the
"Rover Boys", though there's
no way to know if they're
really agents of Rove and not,
for example, members of the
Pentagon's new on-line propaganda
squad.
SURROGATE_TRUTH
It's also, of course, not
always that easy to distinguish
a sincere advocate from a
paid one -- but very often I HUMANITY_METER
think it can be done.
The question might be raised, though:
What difference does it make?
Aren't you supposed to
just address the words
and not the speaker?
Yes, that's the usual advice,
and it's not a bad approach:
even if you correctly
identify a roverboy, it
doesn't necessarily gain
you anything to point it out--
at best it's a distraction,
at worst you may end up
discredited as paranoid.
The most important thing
about it though is your
mental model; your sense
about what you're trying
to accomplish. Against a Rover, you have
no hope of "conversation"
Once you get the there is only "debate".
sense that your
opponent is failing FULL_MONTAIGNE
the Voigt- Kampf
test, there's no
point in trying to
address them as a
human being.
It is not true, however,
that there's nothing you
can learn from a rover,
however the things you
expect to learn change...
Instead of getting insight
into the way a different
mind thinks, you can start
trying to identify the
standard talking points,
try to determine something Walking back
about their current strategy, the scat?
make inferences about what
they're worried about...
--------
[NEXT - PENETRATE_THE_SHELL]