[PREV - NEUTRAL_ADVOCATE] [TOP]
PROPORTIONS
November 25, 2006
As I was saying in
BELOW_THE_FOLD
Since then Israel
has gotten hit in return,
but the levels of civilian
casualties are running at
dozens of Israelies to
hundreds of Lebanese... PROPORTIONS
But I really need to check those ratios,
since it is of course, crucial to get
the right figure.
It would be terrible to accuse Israel of
killing 10x as many innocents as Hezbollah,
if really it were only 5x.
I was just listening to a
Howard Zinn rap about the Zinn's take is unremittingly
state of the world, cynical -- his presumption
and he mentioned in passing is that every single thing
that wars have been getting said by any government,
worse as far as the ratio of anywhere, is a complete lie.
civilian-to-combantants
that are killed. He's so certain about it,
he convinces me that this
must be wrong -- or at
War Casualties, least not quite right.
Percent civilians
(Howard Zinn): (For one thing:
is a government
WWI 10% something that can
WWII 50% know truth?)
Vietnam 70%
Since then 80% - 85%
[ref]
A project for another day:
Research where Zinn gets his
casualty figures.
Look at the ratio throughout
the Israeli-Palestine saga.
Fisk as
initial
source?
Note the difficulties
of determining these
figures, e.g. contoversy
about Iraq, even *after*
study published in Lancet.
How did Marla's
project
go about it?
--------
[NEXT - STATEGIC_BOMBARDMENT]