[PREV - PLAY_WORD] [TOP]
SECOND_THOUGHTS
February 23-28, 2013
My preferred take on the second
amendment is that it's all about The trouble I have
preserving a last ditch defense these days though:
against tyranny.
If some group like the tea
The founders were party took to the streets
revolutionaries, and with guns, it's hard to
they recognized the believe they'd manage to
potential need for shoot the right people.
other, later
revolutions. If people just don't know
what's going on, what good
I'm not sure why some can guns do?
people find that notion so
ridiculous: it's all about If the 1st amendment isn't
the inevitability of doing it's job the 2nd is
corruption, and the of no use.
strategy of checks and
balances. An armed
citizenry is just one of
the checks.
FAVE_A
The somewhat archaic phrase
"well-regulated" (not to
mention "militia") is always
good for lots of fun, though. BALANCE_OF_PRAGMATISM
At the time the bill of
rights was written, the
militia was all able-
bodied males.
I've yet to see an
authoritative
translation of Another way of taking the 2nd
"well-regulated", is that it's a good idea for all
but my reading is citizens to own guns and know how
well-trained & to use them, in the event that you
well-supplied. need to call out the militia.
So it's possible that 'Cause you know,
this function of the no one wants to
2nd has been superseded have a standing
in a world where no one army kicking
thinks twice about around during
spending half the US times of peace,
budget on a permanent, But might one right?
professional military. want to hold
the door open Presuming
to a world you could
without find any.
The need to exercise eternal war?
"the revolutionary
right" in some future We might be better off if we
scenario-- perhaps a were not so accepting of high
far distant future defense expenditures and
scenario-- is harder standing armies. We might
to get away from. try to work toward a world
where a citizen's militia is
I realize that this relevant again.
strikes many people as
completely crazy-- (Via video games and
"how can a handful of civilian drones?)
gun nuts stand up to a
modern army?"-- but I
think it's a more
plausible scenario
that many realize.
I used to need to point out
to people that poorly armed
local guerillas have
advantages against invading "Mother Jones" is distributing an
armies, no matter how large infographic showing that the number
and well-equipped. It seemed of private guns dwarf the police and
weird to me that the country military ones-- you're supposed to
that lost the Vietnam war feel like this means there are too
needed to be reminded of many private guns, but it could also
this... apparently it only be taken as evidence that the force
took ten years or so to of arms necessary for a citizen
forget the lesson. uprising is not an absurdity, and in
fact it may already be present.
I gather that lesson has been
freshly taught to us again:
this point doesn't seem to
come up now.
--------
[NEXT - FAVE_A]