[PREV - GOVERNING_MARKET] [TOP]
STATISTICAL_INDIVIDUAL
April 4, 2003
Stats show:
SUVs aren't safer.
They roll-over. So the SUV drivers all go:
"Oh, we did not realize
that. Why are we
wasting this gas?."
Driving on a cell is
grossly dangerous, like
being drunk.
So the cell phone babblers
say "You know, I should hang
up now so that I can drive."
Right?
Not fucking likely.
Instead, they attack the stats,
and insist that *they* are good
SUV/Cell drivers, and there's no
reason they should be compelled I've also heard people
to change their ways because assert things like "I'm
*some* people can't handle it. a good drunk driver.
All my accidents have
been when I was sober."
I'm reasonably certain That argument
that most of the people doesn't get taken
saying this stuff are seriously, but the
deluded, and certainly suvs-on-cells
they're easy to make fun equivalent is.
of, but it *is* possible
that at least some of them
are correct.
Applying stats to individual cases
is indeed a tricky business.
E.g. the motorcyclists claim that
most accidents happen to people who
aren't even licensed riders yet.
If something like that's true,
you *can* reasonably argue that
the stats are being inflated by
people who are demonstrably not
like yourself.
E.g. it could be that cell
phone collisions are a But there's supposed
phenomena of inexperienced cell to be scientific
people, of which there are a evidence that
lot right now. Maybe it'll indicates that
turn out to be a transient human beings can't
phenomena? handle this much
"multi-tasking"...
--------
[NEXT - DOOM_CONTRA_TARIAN]