[PREV - SLUSH] [TOP]
THE_CASE_OF_HOLMES
April 6, 2008
A subject I've been interested in
of late is the predecessors and
contemporaries of "Sherlock
Holmes". Conan Doyle seems like a
bright but not terribly brilliant
man and sometimes I wonder how he "Conan Doyle made mistakes which
he came up with this pair of completely invalidated some of
characters that have wedged his stories, but he was a
themselves permanently into human pioneer, and Sherlock Holmes
consciousness. after all is mostly an attitude
and a few dozen lines of
Calling Doyle's creation an "act of unforgettable dialogue."
genius" would seem an exaggeration:
he had a number of predecessors Raymond Chandler
(Edgar Allen Poe, Wilkie Collins, "The Simple Art of Murder"
Gaboriau). And Doyle's genius is
not evident in his other creations One does not
(neither Professor Challenger or Sir measure a painting
Nigel have anything like the staying by the number of
power of Holmes). brush strokes.
One might hypothesize that
Doyle just "got lucky"...
if it weren't for the
record of his published
contemporaries.
Sherlock Holmes was an immediate
hit, and Doyle was both unable and
unwilling to keep up with the public
demand. The magazines resorted to
publishing a vast array of imitators
and variants: I own a massive
anthology containing a selection of "The Rivals of
what is presumably the best of Sherlock
these, and they're all terrible, Holmes", Vol 1
almost without exception. and 2.
Few of these stories get even
as far as Poe's "Rue Morgue":
bizarre circumstances
surrounding a logical puzzle.
None get any where near Doyle's One can not just
invention of engaging character. shrug off Holmes as
a case where the
first mover was
locked-in and took
the whole prize.
--------
[NEXT - 13CLOCKS]