[PREV - POV] [TOP]
THE_QUESTION_OF_ESSAYS
October 13, 2004
For much of my high school
career, I was incapable of
doing essay assignments. It
took me some time to put my
finger on the difficulty:
I believed that language
is for communication.
"Why am I writing something
about 'Romeo and Juliet' for (Though the problem was
someone with an English not quite articulated
degree that knows the play so clearly in my
backwards and forwards? mind, or I might
What am I going to tell them have solved it sooner.)
that they don't already
know? Is there any point in
writing about something if
you have nothing new to say?"
There's a mental trick to
doing these assignments that
apparently comes much more
easily to some than others:
you need to write for an
imaginary audience that's
different from the actual
audience. You describe
"Romeo and Juliet" for the
benefit of some dimwit that
doesn't exist, and the Instead, I would scrape together
teacher then grades you on a handful of observations I
your ability to say the thought might be new to the
stunningly obvious with the instructor, and just write down
correct form. brief disjointed notes about them.
(Yeah, I haven't
changed much.)
They used to recite that the proper
form is "introduction/main
body/conclusion", where the
introduction is where you *state
your purpose* --
That left me thinking:
Okay, so what is my purpose?
Maybe I should use an introduction
like this:
My purpose in writing this paper is to
earn a passing grade in a class taught
by ____, and toward that end I will be
pretending to describe the play "Romeo
and Juliet" for some idiot from Mars
that has never heard of it before. In
an attempt at securing a high-grade, I
intend to name-drop a few famous
critics, and incorporate several buzz
words of which ____ seems enamored.
--------
[NEXT - TO_CATCH_A_FAKE]