[PREV - WHOS_ON_FIRST] [TOP]
POV
February 19, 2005
Once upon a time, I conceived a simple,
universal rule about how fictional
narrative should be handled. I'm the kind of person that
likes simple universal rules.
The rule is that all fiction must
have a single point-of-view, and In this case, It's too bad I
you must stick to this "pov" the rule was like to insist
rigorously. based on what on the rules
I suspect is actually being
The reader should know nothing a misreading correct.
that the main character does of Blish/
not know. Atheling
criticism.
WHOS_ON_FIRST
Blish was complaining about
Identification of the reader writers that abruptly shift pov
with the fictional hero is from paragraph to paragraph (or
central to the function of even sentence to sentence).
the story.
I don't think that a
clearly indicated shift
of pov between chapters
(or even scenes) would
have bothered him.
BLISH
There's the question of whether
the narrative is allowed to
jump around in time. A single pov in a
single virtual moment?
The modern style is to
maintain a pretence that Or is the narrative supposed
the reader is riding along to be an account written down
inside of the narrator's in retrospect by the main
head from moment to moment. character? In which case one
might even address the reader
Despite the vestigial past directly.
tense, which is an odd
historical remnant of the Once that was the standard
older narrative style, which narrative device: Doctor Watson
imitates a non-fiction is sitting down discussing why
account of past events. he feels he can now tell the
tale which will follow.
The modern style is a
pseudo-present tense, The fiction of the fiction was
written in past form. that the author was pretending
to be presenting an actual
historical document, something
written by a person involved in
the story.
A story thus begun The-- otherwise
rules out use of an execrable-- critic
omniscient narrator. Darrel Schweitzer named
this well, calling it a
That strikes story with a "frame" in
me as a virtue. analogy to pictures
presented in a frame.
ALL_WRONG
A framing narrative
around the narrative.
Creative writing
classes seem to place a
lot of emphasis on the
choice of the "person"
of the narrative: first
person (past tense) and
third person (past
tense) being the two Second person is
most common choices. always discussed,
though it's rare.
"I walked down the street";
"He walked down the street". "You didn't realize,
did you, as you walked
(Or "She walked --" down the street, that --"
of course.)
Other, even rarer choices are
A point that often seems possible... a friend once
overlooked, though it seems suggested as a joke writing
obvious enough, is that all a story in plural future tense.
these "persons" are connected.
It struck me as very easy
"I am telling to do... e.g. as a prophecy:
you about him." "One day you will all rise up
and become The Great People --"
(or her)
There isn't any reason a
coherent narrative can't
switch between persons--
e.g. in using a framing Examples of contemporary
narrative, the story writers that make good
might start in first, use of a shifting pov?
then shift to third.
Geoffrey Household
comes to mind.
There's no shortage of modern
examples of the kind of problem
that Blish/Atheling was
complaining about, though.
The influence of the movies:
no one can resist rapid
cutting.
--------
[NEXT - THE_QUESTION_OF_ESSAYS]