[PREV - CHEAP_SUSPENDERS] [TOP]
WHOS_ON_FIRST
February 18, 2005
We really need a language of narrative
that doesn't presume a medium.
Typically, a story has an author,
and it has a
main character
viewpoint character
hero
And the story is directed at one or
more human beings, the...
reader?
viewer?
audience?
I'd really like a more
general term for the
"consumer" of the The narratee that
narrative. recieves the
narration from the
narrator.
In practice I often suddenly
shift between terminology,
one moment I say "reader"
envisioning a written story,
another moment I say "viewer"
or "audience" envisioning a
movie/teleplay/play...
Maybe there's a pronoun dodge
of some sort? "And then one wonders
what the main character is thinking."
A related problem in
narrating a narrative
is clumsy jargon like
"main character" and
"point-of-view".
You can't just say Usually these
"the viewpoint", are the same,
because that makes though there
it sound like you are cases where
mean the viewer. they aren't --
Pretty frequently Though typically
in writing about that's a sign that
writing, writers the author is being
resort to the excessively clever.
acronym "pov"...
POV
(Sep 21, 2018)
In discussions of Korean
romantic-comedy television These are
series I've seen people often
use ML and FL for "male called
lead" and "female lead". "romcom"s,
speaking
Another symptom of the of clumsy
difficulty. jargon...
(Jan 9, 2019)
I'm finding their terminology
to be much more convenient
that traditional phrases like Note: technically "kdrama"
"main character", at least for would be a super-set of
discussing the kdrama form: "romcoms", but most of us
don't usually bother to
male lead distinguish, we just let
female lead context sort it out, unless
second male we need to talk about other
kdrama *as opposed* to
It immediately makes it clear romcoms.
which character you're referring
to without presuming perfect
memory of the character's names.
MOVING_REVIEWS
--------
[NEXT - POV]