[PREV - CLEARENCE] [TOP]
CHANGING_CLIMATE
January 12, 2022
DANGERBABY
A friend was over one day
(more of a friend of CLEARENCE
Dangerbaby, really) and he
mentioned in passing a kid had This is a really funny question to ask this
asked him "So, what have *you* particular guy, who-- just for the sake of
done about global warming?" naming names-- was Jeff Conant, who you may
(You boomer, you.) never have heard of, but if you took the
trouble to look him up you'd find he was
His answer was something like one of those "activist" guys who really was
"Uh... Anything I could think trying to do anything he could think of.
of? It didn't work. Do you
want to hear a depressing If you're looking for someone who takes
story?" the trouble to stand-up for his beliefs
while trying to make the world a better
This left me thinking about place, Conant would have to be up in the
my own answer, and answers in first rank-- he's certainly done better
general to this question. at this than I have.
If they're talking about personal For example, I've never been thrown
behavior, Jeff and I are both out of a foreign country for trying to
people who score pretty high-- we help the indigenous people there.
both use bikes as our main mode of
transit, and just as importantly Just as far as
we've got similar attitudes toward environmentalist [link]
American consumerism-- a large street-cred goes:
chunk of our energy use goes into
manufacturing. Being someone who "Jeff Conant directs Friends of
hardly ever buys anything helps a the Earth’s international
lot to reduce your own carbon forests program, which protects
footprint. forests and the rights of
forest-dependent peoples by
Where I suspect our answers would addressing the economic drivers
diverge though, is on the subject of forest destruction."
of nuclear power. I've never
talked to him about it, but Anyway, he's this guy:
it's likely that someone with
FOE has a low opinion of nuclear. [link]
The left in general has tended
to give nuclear power a bad
rap.
NUCLEAR_FAQ
My answer would be something like:
My story is even more depressing (though
I suspect you won't believe I've got it
right): I'm of the opinion that the
left, with the best of intentions, was
played, and sent in a completely
counter-productive direction.
I'm not any where near as
Starting in the mid-70s, I was trying high profile as someone
to get people's attention about the like Jeff Conant-- my
damage we were doing by burning huge most visible publication
amounts of coal (and back then I only was probably an op-ed
thought it was killing thousands of US letter in Newsday arguing
citizens every year-- an underestimate that solar power
by a few orders of magnitude, even satellites were feasible.
without global warming on the table).
I've been arguing the pro-nuclear line
off-and-on for what's getting near the 50 We're still only gradually
year mark, with only minor success-- and the realizing what's been going
entire time, up to the present day, it's been on this whole time, but it
side-lined by a defensive line that in my looks a lot like fossil fuel
opinion remains specious: "But what about money was promoting the
solar and wind?" solar/wind activists to
preserve their own business.
It's *possible* that the
intellectual climate is
shifting on this one:
[link]
And yet, California's Diablo-Canyon is still
slated to close in a few years...
--------
[NEXT - BURROUGHS_LOST]