[PREV - PEIRCE_THE_MAN]    [TOP]

ESSENCE_OF_MAN


                                                          April 5, 2010
   An essay with a title like:                                                
   "Man's Glassy Essence"                 Published Oct 1892, in the "The Monist"       
                                                                                            
   Sounds like a silly stunt, someone                                                      
   working up a woozy metaphor--                            img_7326-img_7339    

   Peirce's version is full of
   equations.  He's talking about        A glass, as opposed to a crystal,
   "glass" as a thermodynamic state,     is a very disordered state.
   and he may be engaging in a woozy     Window glass is like a liquid
   metaphor, but it's a metaphor         frozen in place without crystallizing.
   grounded in a much more detailed
   grasp of "glass" than you would                     It's commonly claimed
   expect... not just "transparent                     that old window glass
   and fragile".                                       has a rippled look
                                                       because it's really
       As with, say                                    a liquid that's been
       "Seymour                                        slowly flowing over
       Glass" or...                                    the centuries.

               GLASS_KEY                               It's also commonly
                             (July 22, 2010)           stated that this is
                                                       really a myth: older
    "Man's Glassy Essence" is a                        glass appears rippled
    fascinating review of the state of                 simply because it was
    scientific knowledge at the time,                  made made by more
    moving through the discoveries about               primitive techniques.
    matter from the study of gasses to
    attempts to make inferences about
    "protoplasm", i.e. the stuff that
    living beings are made of.

    He sketches out many things that are
    easily recognizable as true in
    retrospect (the immense size and         E.g. protoplasm cannot be melted,
    complexity of biological molecules),     because the amount of heat
    and yet also over-reaches the state      needed breaks it up into simpler,
    of knowledge of his time, and            constituent molecules.
    discusses how it is that protoplasm
    is capable of "feeling":

        He was trying to pin
        down how consciousness              (It's a little difficult
        arises from protoplasm!             for a modern reader to see
                                            precisely *what* he's saying,
    In retrospect, we can see it were       if only because of unusual
    best to hold off on questions like      language... e.g. he has a habit
    that without better understanding       of using the word "habit"
    of the basics-- 'tis a virtue of        in a peculiar way.  It
    the "scientific method": it may         almost seems like he means
    encourage an obsession with             any sort of recurrent
    (apparently) meaningless trivia,        behavior... or any mental
    but it reigns you in from               characteristic that persists
    metaphysical questions that may         over time...)
    seem exciting and important, but
    are literally useless to delve into        "The consciousness of a habit
    without the mental and/or physical         involves a general idea.  In
    tools to ground them in reality.           each action of that habit
                                               certain atoms get thrown out
                                               of their orbit, replaced by
                                               others.  Upon all the
    Toward the end of this essay               different occasions it is
    the speculation gets, shall we             different atoms that are
    say, highly speculative.                   thrown off, but they are
                                               analogous from a physical point
    It looks like he's drawing an              of view, and there is an
    analogy between molecules splitting        inward sense of their being
    off molecules, and humans splitting        analogous."
    off ideas.
                                                      THE_PEIRCE_HABIT
    He raises the subject of
    spontaneous sympathetic action,       His suggestion that
    independent parallel invention.       there should be some
                                          way to investigate this
      (The kind of thing that a           phenomena to test his
      more simple-minded person           theories is an admirable
      might confuse with telepathy.       sentiment, but...
      Peirce clearly does not.)


    He also speculates about "hive-minds",
    a kind of over-mind that might form
    out of constituent human minds
    (e.g. national character, religious
    character).

        "None of us can fully realize what the
        minds of corporations are, any more than
        one of my brain-cells can know what the
        whole brain is thinking."



                                     "The consciousness of a general
                                     idea has a certain 'unity of the
                                     ego,' in it, which is identical
                                     when it passes from one mind to
                                     another.  It is, therefore, quite
                                     analogous to a person; and,
                                     indeed, a person is only a
                                     particular kind of general idea."






--------
[NEXT - LITHIUM_FLOWER]