[PREV - IN_DEEP] [TOP]
HARD_PROBLEMS
December 14, 2003
What's the problem with Hard SF?
The central thesis of most Hard SF has nothing to
do with a technological premise, and everything to
do with attitudes towards technology.
The great dream of Hard SF is to celebrate
the technical, to portray a world where the
sufficiently tough-minded will always be able
to see their way through to a solution.
If your crew-cut is short enough, your white
collar crisp and your equations cold, you'll
always find a way to lord it over those damn
bureaucrats
hippies
social workers
artists
businessmen
The Hard SF premise is that there are no
fuzzy edges, there are no inconveniently
intractable problems in human philosophy
and psychology that create knots that
can't be sliced through with the Gordian The conventional way of saying
slide-rule. this is that it "denys humanity",
but that takes too narrow a view
of what is human. Don't deny
humanity their slide-rules...
One thing you have to give Hard SF,
however: while it may be true that
most of it (thankfully, not all) is
not written well, that clunky style
is admirably suited to it's central
message. The writer/reviewer/editor
Del Rey demanded
"transparent" prose that
would not "get in the way".
The idea that prose style can
be done away with in favor of
"content" is a classic example
of what I'm talking about.
Hard SF then, *does* have much
in common with Libertarian
philosphy, in that both of WHEN_THE_DEVIL_QUOTES_SCRIPTURES
them are chasing after a
hard-edged mathematically
certain set of solutions.
RAYMONDS_FOLLY
It's no odd abberation that many of the
early SF writers came up with ideas like:
E.E. Smith - The "Lens of Arasia" that
scientifically certifies the moral character THROUGH_THE_LENS
of the bearer. ("Lensman" series)
Issac Asimov - "Psychohistory", a statistical
science that predicts the outline of human DEAD_HAND
history with near perfect
precision. ("Foundation" series) TWISTED_PATHS
Robert Heinlein - moral issues resolved by
the application of symbolic logic ("Starship
Troopers"), the future predicted by trend-line TROOPERS
extrapolation.
All-too-often "Hard SF" is just
another manifestation of the
Techies Fallacy: human concerns
split neatly into technical and
social matters, and the social
stuff can and should be ignored.
"Hard SF" is often Algis Budrys talks -- a bit
primarily just another awkwardly -- about science
literature of fiction as groping toward
reassurance. homilies, slogans that
express an understanding of
some important point,
One of the undercurrents e.g. "be sure about the
of SF is a quest for things that you're sure
understanding and about."
belonging: a system to
believe in, a talisman Exhibit-A in his thesis
worthy of faith, a group was the Campbell's
of good guys to be good introductory blurbs that
with. The Slans, the often telegraphed the
Space Patrol, The Lens, point of the story in
Null-A. It's about Astounding/Analog.
finding a solid place
stand. And maybe a place
to stick the fulcrum. HOMILETICS
Fans of Korzybski's "Science and Sanity":
Robert A. Heinlein
William Burroughs William Burroughs
Douglas Englebart was also, like James
Tim O'Reilly Blish, a fan of BLISH
Oswald Spengler.
--------
[NEXT - RAYMONDS_FOLLY]