[PREV - COMPARE_CONTRAST_DENY_UNIFY] [TOP]
SCRAPING_DIALECTIC
September 27, 2020
Pouring over a Sartre quotation
about "the dialectical"... CONTRADICTORY_DIALECT
METHODS_FOR_A_SEARCH
It occurs to me I'm trying to find meaning
in the gobblydygook by projecting an
understanding on to it.
So what is it that I want
"the dialectical method" to be?
If you begin with an understanding,
a theory of the world--
And then discover evidence that it's
wrong or incomplete...
You can end up feeling the theory needs
to be abandoned-- you may feel guilty
for having been suckered into it.
You might be left with a lingering sense
of being unable to get anything right,
a fear that you're too stupid to
find or invent a good understanding.
What I *want* from "dialectical reasoning"
is some variation of The Scientific (kinda-sorta) Method:
Theories often aren't perfect, but
even a flawed theory can be of use-- SCIENTIFIC_METHODS
it gives you something to try out,
it can be used as a "model" to be
investigated even if you have no
personal committment to it being
The Truth.
The idea that you need to know
The Truth before you can make
a move is obviously ridiculous
once stated, but even so I think
there've been times when I was
haunted by that sort of attitude.
If you go into the game with an understanding
that there's going to be something like a
"dialectic process", maybe you can dodge some
of that paralysis of truth. You've got an
idea, a best guess, you work with it while you
can, and try to incorporate criticisms as they
arise to refine the idea-- or to create a new one.
That all sounds great to me,
but it's sounded great to me
for several decades now...
METHOD
And so, one might conclude that I'm
stuck on a particular idea about
methods, and I need to refine them.
Still collecting antitheses after
all these years.
And now that I've hit the meta point,
I can close this one off, and rest on
my display of clever self-reflection.
Though that's not *supposed*
to be the point.
--------
[NEXT - INTERDIS]