[PREV - ETHICAL_MORAL] [TOP]
UNDERTHINK
April 24, 2011
There seems to be a trend in
current thinking among There seem to be periodic
intellectuals to justify waves like this...
anti-intellectualism.
There's practically an entire
genre of books like this... no Rebecca Solnit's
one knows anything, so you should "Hope in the Dark"
just *go for it*, trust your gut,
show up those damn eggheads for DARK_HOPE
daring to doubt your daring feats
of intuitive leaps...
Nicholas Taleb's "The Black Swan"
BLACK_SWAN
There's that "Wisdom of Crowds"
result, that purports to show that Somewhat tempered by
an average of guesses from the recent results showing
un-trained out performs an average that even a small amount
of experts. of social "contamination"
produces a group-think
effect, and queers the
advantage of the "crowd".
Similarly, Philip Tetlock argues that
"Foxes" are better than "Hedgehogs" in
their forecasts of the future, and he (But doesn't that make him
also has data to back up the point. one of the Hedgehogs who we
shouldn't trust to get
anything right?)
And perhaps, Daniel Kahneman,
"Thinking, Fast and Slow"?
Dreyfus and Kelly in KAHNEMAN
"All Things Shining"
*say* that they don't David Brooks,
want to be encourage "The Social Animal" ref
the Confident Man, but
how could they not?
ALL_THINGS_SHINING
And there's that
Malcolm Gladwell book,
"Drink". I mean, "Blink".
Stupid is the new smart.
UNINTENDED
--------
[NEXT - PSYCHED]