[PREV - ENCOUNTERING_SCIALABBA] [TOP]
EXTRAORDINARY_COLLECTIVE_PUSILLANIMITY
April 29, 2012
July 15, 2012
September 13, 2012
There's an obvioius critique of much
of the media, mainstream or otherwise,
liberal or otherwise, which can be
succinctly summarized as: "Where's Chomsky?":
From the title essay of
"What Are Intellectuals Good For?", SCIALABBA
p.11 (formatting mine):
"A well-known study by the
sociologist Charles Kadushin KADUSHIN
found that in 1970 Chomsky was
one of the ten most influential
American intellectuals. ... "
"Chomsky ... has not for the last fifteen
years been published ... in any of the
following: The last 15 years
as of of 1987. So
_the New York Times Magazine_, Chomsky was banned
the _New York Times Book Review_, around 1972?
the _Washington Post_,
the _Atlantic_, Chomsky used to publish
_Harper's_, regularly in the
the _New Republic_, New York Review of Books.
the _New York Review of Books_, They ran a piece in 1967
_Dissent_, that Scialabba still
_Commentary_, points to as a favorite
_Partisan Review_, favorite political
_Foriegn Affairs_, or essay. Chomsky continued
_Foreign Policy_. to publish there until
Nor has he once appeared on 1970 or so.
_Nightline_,
the _MacNeil/Lehrer Newshour_, Did something happen
National Public Radio's around 1970? Israel
_All Things Considered_ or went rogue in 1967.
NPR's _Morning Edition_."
It is rather remarkable
"Except as a target of occasional that they could manage to
ignorant sneers, he is largely a ignore *everything* that
nonperson in most of our leading Chomsky has written in
cultural/politcal organs." recent decades, including
the rather popular book
"This extraordinary collective "9/11". Even if his work
pusillanimity-- partly a result, was off-base somewhere,
I suspect, of Chomsky's wouldn't it deserve a
forthright criticism of Israeli critique?
policies-- has taken its toll.
Chomsky's heart has not turned to
stone, but his prose style has
sometimes turned raw."
--------
[NEXT - WHAT_SHOULD_WE_DO]