[PREV - CHILDHOODS_END] [TOP]
WIDER_FIGHT
June 20-27, 2007
July 15, 2007
Lawrence Lessig has spent ten years
or so fighting for the Cultural
Commons to exist, and he has now
decided to go after a larger
problem, which he calls "corruption":
"That the real problem here was
(what I will call a 'corruption'
of) the political process. That
our government can't understand
basic facts when strong
interests have an interest in
its misunderstanding."
[ref]
He's apparently noticed that the
congress and the courts appear to
have no interest in the nearly "From a public policy perspective,
unassailable logic of his case. the question of extending existing
copyright terms is, as Milton
Friedman put it, a 'no brainer.' "
So Lessig is
after the big
game, the He claims he has no
central problem. preconceptions on what
do about it... he is I'm tempted to
merely a beginner, a write up a curriculum
student in a new field. for him, but I'm
not the only one...
WEB_LOG_COMMENTS
I don't know that I agree that
"corruption" is the name of the
devil here.
The opposite presumption: the
tendency toward "corruption"
is inevitable, and that the
actual difficulty is a lack
of an effective
counter-vailing force...
One way of looking at it is that
the only effective large-scale One example: the
organizing strategy anyone has dueling advocacy
found is "checks and balances". of the law courts.
So the problem would then Though, while we expect
be that the "corrupting" paid advocates to present
forces are not arranged in arguments with a certain
opposition to each other bias, we expect a certain
well enough. impartiality on the part
of judges and law-makers.
There may be a way
to play them At the very least we
against each other. expect them to care about
the *appearence* of
impartiality, but often
apparently they don't.
Consider the possibility that
you can get the bastards to The self-interested
sell out their future actors performing
counterparts: they only have these roles see
temporary alliances without little advantage in
any loyalty to any larger performing them well.
group or vision of history.
I would think it would not be
that hard to pass election
reforms such as restrictions
on fund-raising provided that
they phase in very *gradually* The ultimate checks on
over the next decade. This these functions in a
would barely be of concern to democratic society is
a present day politician, no supposed to be the ballot
matter how "corrupt". box, but the ballot box
Why not go for it if it (1) is increasingly
keeps the rubes happy for under attack in the form
another few terms, while of electoral corruption.
you continue to cash-in?
LAST_EXIT_FOR_DEMOCRACY
(2) reflects the spin
placed on the world by
the major media
MOST_TRUSTED_NAME
Though perhaps the
major media gets
away only with what
it feels it can get
away with...
The lack of any
shock on our part
from hearing
about media bias
is probably part
of the problem.
A simple
model,
a chain of Or: a network
corruption: of self-reinforcing
corruptions?
On the bench,
in high office,
in news media,
of the spirit.
--------
[NEXT - THREAT_MODELS]