[PREV - ASTIGMATIC] [TOP]
NEVER_SAY_NEVERYON
A summary of where I've stood with
Delany's Neveryon project for over
a decade:
Read the first volume.
Found it tedious.
However, I'm willing to concede
that I just don't get it.
I haven't read the second and third
volumes... but I have bought them.
They sit on the shelves, awaiting
the day that I decide to see if
(a) they're better than the first or
(b) I've turned into someone who
appreciates them.
DHALGREN
Delany had continual fights with his publisher
where he had to remind them that these books There's a similar
were indeed selling well, despite the fact that need to point out
they're weird-ass high-brow shit. to self-described
SF fans that Dhalgren
was not only not a
commercial failure,
but has sold around
a million copies.
Could it be that there's a certain It's not
advantage to the "high brow" buzz: commercial
once you get to a certain level product! Ergo,
some people will buy just because it must not be
they think they should, but if they commercially
don't get around to reading it successful.
they'll feel like it's they're own
fault. Revising your
profile for
If you didn't read the "commercial
last Robert Parker book product" does
you bought, there not seem to be
clearly isn't any an option.
reason to buy the next
one: If you don't enjoy
them, why force yourself?
A variant of the
artist-as-con-artist
model. HONEST_JOHN
Anyway, reading Delany's "1984"
(a collection of letters written
during the period when he was
finishing up Neveryon) I get the
sense that --
(I wonder where I was going
with this. Oh well: pick
something I might have been saying...)
He regarded these as his masterwork.
He was annoyed that some people (like
myself) preferred the quickly dashed
off "Stars in My Pocket".
The stories get increasingly strange as
the series progresses, and hence I might
find the later volumes more interesting.
--------
[NEXT - WAR_AND_PEACE]